Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
department:ta-program [2024/09/17 23:46] – [JMU CS TA Program] weikledadepartment:ta-program [2024/09/17 23:57] (current) – [In-Class TA] weikleda
Line 9: Line 9:
 ===== In-Class TA ===== ===== In-Class TA =====
 For instructors of our intro courses (CS 149 and CS 159) who choose to work with a TA, our trained undergraduate TAs regularly attend some or all of the courses' meetings (at the preference of the instructor) to help facilitate in-person activities such as labs and [[https://cspogil.org/Home|POGIL]] activities. For instructors of our intro courses (CS 149 and CS 159) who choose to work with a TA, our trained undergraduate TAs regularly attend some or all of the courses' meetings (at the preference of the instructor) to help facilitate in-person activities such as labs and [[https://cspogil.org/Home|POGIL]] activities.
 +
 +===== References =====
 +[1] S. Brown and X. Yuan. Experiences with retaining computer science students. Journal of Computing
 +Sciences in Colleges, 29(5):34{41, 2014.
 +
 +[2] F. J. Estrada and A. Tafliovich. Bridging the gap between desired and actual qualifications of teaching
 +assistants: An experience report. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Innovation and Technology
 +in Computer Science Education, ITiCSE '17, page 134{139. Association for Computing Machinery, Jun 2017.
 +
 +[3] D. G. Kay. Training computer science teaching assistants: a seminar for new tas. In Proceedings of the
 +twenty-sixth SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer science education, SIGCSE '95, page 53{55.
 +Association for Computing Machinery, Mar 1995.
 +
 +[4] C. M. Lewis and P. Conrad. Teaching practices game: Interactive resources for training teaching assistants. In Proceedings of the 51st ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, SIGCSE '20, page 1110{1111. Association for Computing Machinery, Feb 2020.
 +
 +[5] D. Mirza, P. T. Conrad, C. Lloyd, Z. Matni, and A. Gatin. Undergraduate teaching assistants in computer science: A systematic literature review. In Proceedings of the 2019 ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research, ICER '19, page 31{40. Association for Computing Machinery, Jul 2019.
 +
 +[6] E. M. Peck, M. E. Smith, and M. C. Stewart. Hci for pui: human-computer interaction for primarily-undergraduate institutions. In WORKSHOP: Developing a Community of Practice to Support Global
 +HCI Education of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 2018.
 +
 +[7] H. Pon-Barry, A. St. John, B. W.-L. Packard, and B. Rotundo. A exible curriculum for promoting inclusion through peer mentorship. In Proceedings of the 50th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, SIGCSE '19, page 1116{1122, New York, NY, USA, 2019. Association for Computing Machinery.
 +
 +[8] D. A. Weikle. More insights on a peer tutoring model for small schools with limited funding and resources.
 +Journal of Computing Sciences in Colleges, 31(3):101{109, 2016.
 +